Main menu

16S vs shotgun nanopore sequencing detected different taxa in the same freshwater samples


Problem:

16S and shotgun assembly and read-based approaches are widely used for taxonomic profiling. The resulted taxonomic assignments are compared across studies. We showed that the estimated taxa are biased by the choice of shotgun vs amplicon method.

Methods:

  • Target database: GTDB Release 207
  • Shotgun read-based: DIAMOND-Megan-LR
  • Shotgun assembly-based: MetaFlye; Racon; Medaka; MaxBin; Vamb; Metabat; DasTool
  • 16S amplicon: Emu

Results:

Differences in presence and relative abundance already on phylum level Discovered diversity: shotgun read-based > 16S > assembly-based approach High-quality MAGs reflected only the most abundant taxa Higher basecalling accuracy -> long reads of higher quality -> better alignments -> robust taxonomic profiling for shotgun and amplicon methods.

Discussion:

Possible reasons for differences in relative abundance: high-quality MAGs are not representative for sample composition because many reads discarded since simply not map to bins amplification bias differences in genome size copy-number variation.

Download the PDF

Getting started

Buy a MinION starter pack Nanopore store Sequencing service providers Channel partners

Nanopore technology

Subscribe to Nanopore updates Resources and publications What is the Nanopore Community

About Oxford Nanopore

News Company timeline Sustainability Leadership team Media resources & contacts For investors For partners Working at Oxford Nanopore Current vacancies Commercial information BSI 27001 accreditationBSI 90001 accreditationBSI mark of trust
English flag