Main menu

Mutational pressure drives differential genome conservation in two bacterial endosymbionts of sap feeding insects


Compared to free-living bacteria, endosymbionts of sap-feeding insects have tiny and rapidly evolving genomes. Increased genetic drift, high mutation rates, and relaxed selection associated with host control of key cellular functions all likely contribute to genome decay. Phylogenetic comparisons have revealed massive variation in endosymbiont evolutionary rate, but such methods make it difficult to partition the effects of mutation vs. selection.

For example, the ancestor of auchenorrhynchan insects contained two obligate endosymbionts, Sulcia and a betaproteobacterium (BetaSymb; called Nasuia in leafhoppers) that exhibit divergent rates of sequence evolution and different propensities for loss and replacement in the ensuing ∼300 Ma. Here, we use the auchenorrhynchan leafhopper Macrosteles sp. nr. severini, which retains both of the ancestral endosymbionts, to test the hypothesis that differences in evolutionary rate are driven by differential mutagenesis.

We used a high-fidelity technique known as duplex sequencing to measure and compare low-frequency variants in each endosymbiont. Our direct detection of de novo mutations reveals that the rapidly evolving endosymbiont (Nasuia) has a much higher frequency of single-nucleotide variants than the more stable endosymbiont (Sulcia) and a mutation spectrum that is even more AT-biased than implied by the 83.1% AT content of its genome. We show that indels are common in both endosymbionts but differ substantially in length and distribution around repetitive regions.

Our results suggest that differences in long-term rates of sequence evolution in Sulcia vs. BetaSymb, and perhaps the contrasting degrees of stability of their relationships with the host, are driven by differences in mutagenesis.

Authors: Gus Waneka, Yumary M. Vasquez, Gordon M. Bennett, Daniel B. Sloan

Getting started

Buy a MinION starter pack Nanopore store Sequencing service providers Channel partners

Quick links

Intellectual property Cookie policy Corporate reporting Privacy policy Terms & conditions Accessibility

About Oxford Nanopore

Contact us News Media resources & contacts Investor centre Careers BSI 27001 accreditationBSI 90001 accreditationBSI mark of trust
English flag