Main menu

Evaluation of hybrid and non-hybrid methods for de novo assembly of nanopore reads


Motivation
Recent emergence of nanopore sequencing technology set a challenge for established assembly methods. In this work, we assessed how existing hybrid and non-hybrid de novo assembly methods perform on long and error prone nanopore reads.

Results
We benchmarked five non-hybrid (in terms of both error correction and scaffolding) assembly pipelines as well as two hybrid assemblers which use third generation sequencing data to scaffold Illumina assemblies. Tests were performed on several publicly available MinION and Illumina datasets of Escherichia coli K-12, using several sequencing coverages of nanopore data (20×, 30×, 40× and 50×). We attempted to assess the assembly quality at each of these coverages, in order to estimate the requirements for closed bacterial genome assembly. For the purpose of the benchmark, an extensible genome assembly benchmarking framework was developed. Results show that hybrid methods are highly dependent on the quality of NGS data, but much less on the quality and coverage of nanopore data and perform relatively well on lower nanopore coverages. All non-hybrid methods correctly assemble the E. coli genome when coverage is above 40×, even the non-hybrid method tailored for Pacific Biosciences reads. While it requires higher coverage compared to a method designed particularly for nanopore reads, its running time is significantly lower.

Availability: https://github.com/kkrizanovic/NanoMark

Authors: Ivan Sovic, Kresimir Krizanovic, Karolj Skala, Mile Sikic

入門

MinION Starter Packを購入 ナノポア製品の販売 シークエンスサービスプロバイダー グローバルディストリビューター

ナノポア技術

ナノポアの最新ニュースを購読 リソースと発表文献 Nanopore Communityとは

Oxford Nanoporeについて

ニュース 会社沿革 持続可能性 経営陣 メディアリソース & お問い合わせ先 投資家向け パートナー向け Oxford Nanopore社で働く 現在の募集状況 営業上の情報 BSI 27001 accreditationBSI 90001 accreditationBSI mark of trust
Japanese flag