Main menu

Tracking the introduction and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in coastal Kenya


We generated 274 SARS-CoV-2 genomes from samples collected during the early phase of the Kenyan pandemic. Phylogenetic analysis identified 8 global lineages and at least 76 independent SARS-CoV-2 introductions into Kenyan coast. The dominant B.1 lineage (European origin) accounted for 82.1% of the cases. Lineages A, B and B.4 were detected from screened individuals at the Kenya-Tanzania border or returning travellers but did not lead to established transmission. Though multiple lineages were introduced in coastal Kenya within three months following the initial confirmed case, none showed extensive local expansion other than cases characterised by lineage B.1, which accounted for 45 of the 76 introductions. We conclude that the international points of entry were important conduits of SARS-CoV-2 importations. We speculate that early public health responses prevented many introductions leading to established transmission, but nevertheless a few undetected introductions were sufficient to give rise to an established epidemic.

Authors: George Githinji, Zaydah R. de Laurent , Khadija Said Mohammed , Donwilliams O. Omuoyo , Peter M. Macharia , John M. Morobe , Edward Otieno , Samson M. Kinyanjui, Ambrose Agweyu , Eric Maitha , Ben Kitole , Thani Suleiman, Mohamed Mwakin

入門

MinION Starter Packを購入 ナノポア製品の販売 シークエンスサービスプロバイダー グローバルディストリビューター

お問い合わせ

Intellectual property Cookie policy Corporate reporting Privacy policy Terms & conditions Accessibility

Oxford Nanoporeについて

Contact us 経営陣 メディアリソース & お問い合わせ先 投資家向け Oxford Nanopore社で働く BSI 27001 accreditationBSI 90001 accreditationBSI mark of trust
Japanese flag