Main menu

The genomes of precision edited cloned calves show no evidence for off-target events or increased de novo mutagenesis


Animal health and welfare are at the forefront of public concern and the agricultural sector is responding by prioritising the selection of welfare-relevant traits in their breeding schemes. In some cases, welfare-enhancing traits such as horn-status (i.e., polled) or diluted coat colour, which could enhance heat tolerance, may not segregate in breeds of primary interest, highlighting gene-editing tools such as the CRISPR-Cas9 technology as an approach to rapidly introduce variation into these populations. A major limitation preventing the acceptance of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene-editing, however, is the potential for off-target mutagenesis, which has raised concerns about the safety and ultimate applicability of this technology.

Here, we present a clone-based study design that has allowed a detailed investigation of off-target and de novo mutagenesis in a cattle line bearing edits in the PMEL gene for diluted coat-colour. No off-target events were detected from high depth whole genome sequencing performed in precursor cell-lines and resultant calves cloned from those edited and non-edited cell lines. Long molecule sequencing at the edited site and plasmid-specific PCRs did not reveal structural variations and/or plasmid integration events in edited samples. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis of de novo mutations across samples revealed that the mutation frequency and spectra were unaffected by editing status.

Cells in culture, however, had a distinct mutation signature where de novo mutations were predominantly C>A mutations, and in cloned calves they were predominantly T>G mutations, deviating from the expected excess of C>T mutations. We conclude that the gene-edited cells and calves in this study did not present a higher mutation load than unedited controls. Cell culture and somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning processes contributed the major source of contrast in mutational profile between samples.

Authors: Swati Jivanji, Chad Harland, Sally Cole, Brigid Brophy, Dorian Garrick, Russell Snell, Mathew Littlejohn, Götz Laible

Getting started

Buy a MinION starter pack Nanopore store Sequencing service providers Channel partners

Nanopore technology

Subscribe to Nanopore updates Resources and publications What is the Nanopore Community

About Oxford Nanopore

News Company timeline Sustainability Leadership team Media resources & contacts For investors For partners Working at Oxford Nanopore Current vacancies Commercial information BSI 27001 accreditationBSI 90001 accreditationBSI mark of trust
Spanish flag